Artikelaktionen
Zitierweise und Metadaten
Empfohlene Zitierweise
Harnischfeger J (2009). 'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria. Afrikanistik online, Vol. 2008. (urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569)
Download Citation
Endnote
%0 Journal Article %T 'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria %A Harnischfeger, Johannes %J Afrikanistik online %D 2009 %V 2008 %N 5 %@ 1860-7462 %F harnischfeger2009 %X Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article – Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias – pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them. %L 960 %K Bakassi-Boys %K Igba %K Milizen %K Nigeria %K Vigilantes %K militia %U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569Download
Bibtex
@Article{harnischfeger2009,
author = "Harnischfeger, Johannes",
title = "'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria",
journal = "Afrikanistik online",
year = "2009",
volume = "2008",
number = "5",
keywords = "Bakassi-Boys; Igba; Milizen; Nigeria; Vigilantes; militia",
abstract = "Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article -- Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias -- pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them.",
issn = "1860-7462",
url = "http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569"
}
Download
RIS
TY - JOUR AU - Harnischfeger, Johannes PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - 'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria JO - Afrikanistik online VL - 2008 IS - 5 KW - Bakassi-Boys KW - Igba KW - Milizen KW - Nigeria KW - Vigilantes KW - militia AB - Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article – Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias – pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them. SN - 1860-7462 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569 ID - harnischfeger2009 ER -Download
Wordbib
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" > <b:Source> <b:Tag>harnischfeger2009</b:Tag> <b:SourceType>ArticleInAPeriodical</b:SourceType> <b:Year>2009</b:Year> <b:PeriodicalTitle>Afrikanistik online</b:PeriodicalTitle> <b:Volume>2008</b:Volume> <b:Issue>5</b:Issue> <b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569</b:Url> <b:Author> <b:Author><b:NameList> <b:Person><b:Last>Harnischfeger</b:Last><b:First>Johannes</b:First></b:Person> </b:NameList></b:Author> </b:Author> <b:Title>'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria</b:Title> <b:Comments>Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article – Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias – pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them.</b:Comments> </b:Source> </b:Sources>Download
ISI
PT Journal AU Harnischfeger, J TI 'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria SO Afrikanistik online PY 2009 VL 2008 IS 5 DE Bakassi-Boys; Igba; Milizen; Nigeria; Vigilantes; militia AB Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article – Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias – pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them. ERDownload
Mods
<mods>
<titleInfo>
<title>'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="family">Harnischfeger</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Johannes</namePart>
</name>
<abstract>Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article – Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias – pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them.</abstract>
<subject>
<topic>Bakassi-Boys</topic>
<topic>Igba</topic>
<topic>Milizen</topic>
<topic>Nigeria</topic>
<topic>Vigilantes</topic>
<topic>militia</topic>
</subject>
<classification authority="ddc">960</classification>
<classification authority="ddc">390</classification>
<relatedItem type="host">
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre>academic journal</genre>
<titleInfo>
<title>Afrikanistik online</title>
</titleInfo>
<part>
<detail type="volume">
<number>2008</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<number>5</number>
</detail>
<date>2009</date>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="issn">1860-7462</identifier>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">harnischfeger2009</identifier>
</mods>
Download
Full Metadata
| Bibliographisches Zitat | Afrikanistik Online, Vol. 2008, Iss. 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Titel |
'Balance of Terror' -- Rival Militias and Vigilantes in Nigeria (eng) |
|
| Autor | Johannes Harnischfeger | |
| Sprache | eng | |
| Zusammenfassung | Militias and vigilantes that assume public authority by fighting crime reject the laws of the state, yet they have no other set of rules to regulate their activities. Many of them claim to be accountable to their ethnic or religious community on whose behalf they operate. But their communities have found no means to institutionalise control over them. Moreover, there are no institutions to settle conflicts between different militias and vigilantes. On a local level, rival groups have reached informal arrangements. However, these compromises are unstable, as they reflect fragile alliances and shifting balances of power. Leaders of militias and other 'self-determination groups' have suggested organising a conference of all ethnic nationalities in Nigeria in order to design a new constitution that would give militias and vigilantes a legal role and define their authority. But the groups compared in this article – Oodua People's Congress, Sharia Vigilantes, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger Delta militias – pursue very divergent interests, and they are far from reaching a consensus on how to contain violence between them. Milizen und Vigilanten, die sich öffentliche Autorität anmaßen, indem sie Verbrecher bekämpfen, halten sich nicht an die Gesetze des Staates. Sie haben freilich keinen anderen Gesetzes-Kodex, der ihre Aktivitäten regeln würde. Viele von ihnen behaupten, der eigenen Ethnie oder Religionsgemeinschaft verpflichtet zu sein, in deren Namen sie kämpfen. Doch die lokalen Gemeinschaften verfügen über keine wirksamen Institutionen, um die bewaffneten jungen Männer zu kontrollieren. Zudem gibt es keine Institutionen, um Konflikte zwischen Milizen und Vigilanten beizulegen. Auf lokaler Ebene verständigen sich rivalisierende Gruppen immer wieder auf Kompromisse. Aber diese informellen Absprachen sind instabil, reflektieren sie doch fragile Allianzen und wechselnde Machtverhältnisse. Führer von Milizen und anderen 'Selbstbestimmungsgruppen' haben vorgeschlagen, eine Konferenz aller Ethnien in Nigeria zu organisieren, um eine neue Verfassung zu entwerfen, die den Milizen und Vigilanten eine legale Funktion und klare Befugnisse geben würde. Doch die Gruppen, die in diesem Artikel miteinander verglichen werden: Oodua People's Congress, Sharia-Vigilanten, Bakassi Boys, MASSOB, and Niger-Delta-Milizen, verfolgen ganz unterschiedliche Interessen, und sie sind weit entfernt von einem Konsens, wie sich die Gewalt zwischen ihnen eindämmen lässt. | |
| Freie Schlagworte | Bakassi-Boys, Igba, Milizen, Nigeria, Vigilantes, militia | |
| Normierte Schlagworte |
|
|
| DDC | 960 | 390 |
| Rechte | DPPL | |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:0009-10-17569 |
